|
A HOME BUSINESS Opportunity
Leading The Way In Helping You Start A Home Business
|
|
Recommended Affiliate Programs
|
Viral
Marketing - impacting established brands By - Paul Grant In a rapidly changing
technological landscape, some high profile brands are facing the challenging
decision of whether to embrace 'viral' marketing campaigns. As there can be no
assurances with each viral project, executives do not have the 'usual' facts and
figures to make a well-informed and substantiated decision. By its very nature a
viral project must be unlike anything that has been done before. This means there is
no formula, no statistics, nor guarantees. Results can only be proven
retrospectively, by which time it can be too late for those results to have any
more meaning than the knowledge that viral marketing works in principle. Even
the most successful new media viral campaigns would likely not be able to
generate anything like the same results if replicated by another company simply
wanting to emulate that same success. Viral marketing is in
this way a high risk, high gain means of marketing. It is changing all the time
and there are not really any experts that can accurately predict how the
marketplace will respond. Fortunately the cost is not measured in financial
terms, but only in the way the public perceives the brand. Get it right and a
brand can become suddenly very prominent in secondary media articles and
traditional media. Get it wrong and the brand's reputation can be affected
negatively. Sometimes this secondary (and free) publicity ends up impacting the
campaign more than the viral content itself. Large, slower moving
corporations are being startled into responding to these changes as best they
can. Smaller and more progressive companies are challenging the old stalwarts of
business by using whatever viral means they can to establish greater market
share. Often the biggest and
most well respected brands are not accustomed to this radical and
non-traditional approach to marketing, having spent many years establishing an
expensive, rigorously consistent and highly polished corporate identity. Their
company identity may well have evolved over several decades. For such a company
to consider the idea of diluting the brand into something generic, cheap,
gossipy, comic, populist, or otherwise remarkable to the masses raises red flags
and executive concerns. These executives naturally fear losing the consistency
of their on-brand message, or the particular 'look and feel' of the brand as
predetermined in their own internal corporate style guides. Yet those
corporations that are taking risks in the way they present their brand by
embracing this viral trend are already observing great benefits, with lower
costs and higher response rates from their target market. They are perceived by
their target demographic as 'cool', 'hip', 'cutting edge', and 'in touch' with a
changing world. Consider Nike(tm),
Adidas(tm), and Pepsi(tm). All three brands have used viral marketing as a
mainstay of their digital FIFA World Cup 06 football campaigns. The power of viral
marketing is that people willingly pass it on for free, which means there are no
manufacturing, packaging, licensing, or distribution costs. The total cost of
ownership includes only the cost involved in creating the initial idea and the
actual content. How viral marketing works
Some of the most effective viral content is quite poor in production quality and often quite controversial if not offensive to some, but if successful will be high in public appeal. This can also be an obstacle for some executives whose brand has been built on maintaining the highest production and moral standards in all printed and televised materials. Sometimes the more professional or polished something looks, the less likely the end-user will be to consider the source credibly worth passing on. In some cases, the
corporation funding or initiating the viral content will actually distance
themselves from the content and claim to have no knowledge of how it came to be,
nor that they had anything to do with its creation. This is all a public
relations angle to improve the chances of the mass market accepting the content
as non-intrusive. If on the other hand,
the recipient or user is actually stimulated to respond emotionally to a piece
of viral marketing i.e. anger, disgust, joy, sadness, laughter etc. they will
likely also want their circle of friends to experience the very same thing. It
is the very targeted nature of a 'circle of friends' that makes viral marketing
so effective. The old anonymous saying has some merit in this context ... 'Birds of
a feather flock together.' If a company or brand
can make a solid impression on any single individual within a selected group,
that person will likely share about it with their 'flock' knowing that it will
also be of interest to them. A viral campaign
could end up affecting several million highly targeted consumers, which to
achieve using traditional media would potentially cost as many dollars, Pounds,
or Euros as the amount of consumers reached. Generating a return on investment
using traditional media has a greatly reduced profit margin in comparison to the
miniscule investment involved in initially creating a piece of viral marketing. The
importance of embracing viral marketing Increasing bandwidth
is now making possible for the first time such things as video on demand, live
video, IPTV, and other formats of rich media interactivity. Those companies that
are harnessing these trends in a creative and viral way are finding themselves
to be moving ahead of competitors who perhaps previously held the greatest
market share by spending large sums of money in the traditional media. The success of a
viral marketing campaign can only really be measured in terms of how many people
visit or view a viral site, or how many times an email has been read and so on.
In some cases it may also be possible to measure click-through conversion via a
call to action, although this level of transparency can often also become an
obstacle to the tool becoming viral in an epidemic way. There are currently
very little hard statistics demonstrating conclusively that viral marketing
makes a difference to the bottom line, yet there is no doubt that this type of
content is being seen by millions of people. Much like television advertising,
it is not always clear whether people are buying product because of the advert
or in response to a variety of brand promotions across multiple platforms. Those large
corporations who are struggling to reconcile whether to embrace the idea of
viral marketing now have the advantage that they can learn from some of the
world's largest and best-known brands. As these brands have been forced to
change their understanding of marketing on a day-by-day basis, so too will all
companies wanting to compete in tomorrow's world. In the coming years many more
companies with their traditionally established branding will need to concede
that the concepts of marketing are changing right now, and very quickly at that.
By seemingly diluting their brand in order to create generic
viral content, these companies can in fact capture the interest of the next
generation of media users, thereby building a massive community of loyal
customers that not only buy but also recommend their products and services. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- About The Author: Paul Grant is a
convergence evangelist and digital media strategist, having spent eleven years
managing and implementing rich media projects. He is now a partner of
London-based consultancy Interactive
Strategy Ltd. ********************************************
Home Marketing Tips Helpful Resources Added Resources Articles Helpful Links Recommended Affiliate Programs Free Newsletter Contact Us Reciprocal Links Submit An Article
Copyright © AHomeBusinessOpportunity.net, All Rights
Reserved. |
|
|